2025 Student Flash Talks Enology

June 18, 2025 – 4:30pm – 5:30pm

Enology

Some student authors have been assigned oral, 3.25-minute Flash Talks. These “flash” presentations will provide additional opportunities for interaction between conference attendees and student researchers.

Flash Talks will take place on Wednesday, June 18, 4:30 pm – 5:30 pm, at the Portola Hotel in Monterey, California.

Moderator:

Karen Block, University of California, Davis

Speakers:

4:30:00 pm – 4:33:15 pmRapid Detection and Risk Assessment of Smoke-Derived Volatile Phenols: A Chemometric Approach using Spectrofluorometry
Brandt Bastow, University of California, Davis
4:33:15 pm – 4:36:30 pmChemical and Sensory Effects of Turbidity, Hyperoxygenation and Redox Potential on Grenache Blanc Wines from California
Mia Pargellis, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
4:36:30 pm – 4:39:45 pmEffects of Micro-Oxygenation and Redox Potential Control by Air Sparging During Alcoholic Fermentation on Syrah Wines
Jordan Wright, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
4:39:45 pm – 4:43:00 pmCharacterizing Oregon Vineyard and Winery Brettanomyces Strains for Spoilage Potential
C. Michael Sonza, Oregon State University, Corvallis,
4:43:00 pm – 4:46:15 pmOptimizing Strategies for Acid Management in Red Wines from the Central Coast of California
Charlotte Drop, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
4:46:15 pm – 4:49:30 pmExamining the Role of Frost Damage on Leaf Composition to Unravel the Mystery of the “Frost” Taint Wine Phenomenon
Mitchell Davey, Washington State University, Tri-Cities
4:49:30 pm – 4:52:45 pmValidation of Protocols for Acid Hydrolysis of Smoke Related Glycosides
Julie Hilland, Washington State University, Tri-Cities
4:52:45 pm – 4:56:00 pmA New Method for Tannin Fingerprinting and Quantification via LC-MS/MS-Electrospray Ionization In-Source Fragmentation
Yanxin Lin, The Pennsylvania State University, State College
4:56:00 pm – 4:59:15 pmIdentification of Novel Californian Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains with Enological Potential
Sydney Rogers, University of California, Davis
4:59:15 pm – 5:02:30 pmStrain Selection and Timing of Malolactic Fermentation: Shaping the Chemistry of Pinot noir Wine
Nicholas Mannino, Oregon State University, Corvallis
5:02:30 pm – 5:05:45 pmEvaluating the Impact of Cool and Warm Climate on Grenache blanc and Viognier Wine Quality in California’s Central Coast
Coleman Imrisek, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
5:05:45 pm – 5:09:00 pmWine Technical Tasting Reveals No Yield Specific Sensory Relationship in Pinot noir Crop Load Trial
Ainsley McCollum, Oregon State University, Corvallis
5:09:00 pm – 5:12:15 pmThe Influence of Packaging Material on the Properties of Carbonated Blueberry Wine Under Accelerated Storage Conditions
Nick Wendrick, University of Florida, Gainesville
5:12:15 pm – 5:15:30 pmNon-contact Post-fermentation Wine Processing to Remove Thiol-Related Smoke Compounds
Lik Rong Lim, Oregon State University, Corvallis
5:15:30 pm – 5:18:45 pmInvestigation of Grape Skin Thickness and Grape Skin Lipid Content for Differences in Smoke Taint Composition
Chanda Miller, Oregon State University, Corvallis
5:18:45 pm – 5:22:00 pmProfiling Texas-Grown and -Produced Wines Using Untargeted LC-MS-Based Metabolomics
Delaney Dyer, The University of Texas at Austin

Mitchell Davey | Danielle Fox | James Harbertson

Comparison of Freeze-Killed versus Freeze-Dried Leaves for the Production of Frost Tainted Cabernet Sauvignon Wines

Mitchell Davey, Danielle Fox, and James Harbertson*
*Washington State University, 2710 Crimson Way, Richland, WA, 99354-1671 (jfharbertson@wsu.edu)

A commercial freeze-dryer was used to emulate the effects of freeze-killed leaf material on Cabernet Sauvignon wines in 2023. Fresh leaves were collected from a vineyard in Sunnyside, WA one month prior to harvest, and freeze-killed leaves (FK) were collected at harvest. The fresh leaves were subjected to freeze-drying (FD). The FK and FD leaves were added directly to the must prior to fermentation at two rates (0.9 and 3.6 g/kg must) including a control (0 g/kg must). Basic wine chemistry was unaffected by the additions. Untargeted solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to identify major aroma compounds present. Tentatively identified compounds were evaluated statistically. Twenty-three compounds were found to vary significantly based on the treatments. Alcohols were significantly reduced by both leaf treatments. Terpenoids and norisoprenoids significantly increased with increased leaf dosages. A previously-suggested frost taint marker, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-ol, which smells like coriander was only found in the FK-treated wines. Esters significantly increased in both treatments, consistent with dosage. Phenolics were measured in the wines using the Adams-Harbertson assay. Counter to previous results, wines made with both FK and FD leaves had significantly more phenolics and anthocyanins were unaffected. With the exception of the single frost taint marker, the FD treatments emulated the FK-treated wines.

Funding Support: Washington Wine Commission

Share This Page